🔗 Share this article

A collective of individuals affected by the state-led suppression amid the 2022 "Zan, Zendegi, Azadi" uprising has initiated a first-of-its-kind criminal complaint targeting forty identified Iranian authorities of alleged human rights violations.

Case Filing Pursued in the Argentinian System

The formal request for a legal inquiry to be commenced was filed within the Argentinian legal system. This step was undertaken by a group of Iranians aided by a non-governmental documentation center. Argentina's legal framework are particularly open to accepting cases based on universal jurisdiction.

The filing asserts that the reaction from Iran's security forces to the protests entailed "discharging lethal rounds, marker guns, harmful pellets improperly used for short distances, and other projectiles at civilians." The case further states widespread detentions, torture in detention, and executions of participants that are said to persist to this day.

Officials Named Anonymously

Named individuals representing the spectrum of Iran's law enforcement have been listed in the complaint, but their personal details are currently being kept confidential.

Personal Stories Motivate the Case

One of the litigants, UK-based Mahsa Piraei, commented that the purpose "is far from personal vengeance in a personal sense, but accountability and truth." Her mother, Minoo Majidi, in her sixties, was shot dead in late 2022. Medical examinations indicated more than 167 harmful shots had been discharged into her posterior at near-contact distance. She had been participating in a gathering regarding the demise of Mahsa Amini, a youthful Kurdish woman who was killed after arrest.

Piraei, among Majidi's three offspring, was based abroad at the time of her parent's brutal death. She went back to Iran at significant personal danger to see the gravesite. Her sibling Roya shared a photograph of herself by their mother's grave with her scalp shaved on a private social media account. A acquaintance published the photo, which spread widely, ultimately compelling Roya to flee for Turkey.

Piraei stated: "Through official complaints and documentation the intention is to maintain records, name crimes and stop the disappearance." She described her parent's killing as "part of a pattern but part of a systematic practice."

Additional Complainants Consist of Those Shot in the Eye

The other two complainants who have come forward are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both survivors of eye injuries at point-blank by paintball guns.

Eftekhari, a 23-year-old scholar, was shot in the face in late 2022. She had been demonstrating for weeks, witnessing fellow protesters being hit by live ammunition and being assaulted herself with shock weapons. During a gathering on October 12th, she was at a rally near a educational institution when a plainclothes officer shot her with several paintballs from a distance of about a meter. He then allegedly targeted her eye when she did not obey his command to leave. A recording of the assault showing blood pouring from her eye spread online, and she was subsequently granted asylum in Germany.

Shahinkar, in her late thirties when assaulted on 18 October, only became aware what had transpired when she noticed something warm on her face. Fellow individuals warned her not to board an emergency vehicle for fear of being delivered to a police station. When she finally reached a treatment facility, a worker instructed her to go away because they did not help protesters. A doctor examined her and directed her to a medical center, where Shahinkar pretended a object had inadvertently injured her vision so she would not be refused care. She published photos of her wounds online, and in the new year, plainclothes officers approached her, causing her to leave the country. She later received a notable recognition as a symbol of the campaign.

International Law Principle Creates Avenue for Action

The collective seeking the legal probe assert that the case is not viewed just as a paper exercise with slim prospect of a practical outcome. The concept enables allegations to be probed in a different state even if the offence did not take place in that jurisdiction and the offender is not present there. Argentina has notably open rules on such matters in the world.

The doctrine of universal jurisdiction has historically resulted in dozens of convictions and the initiation of cases covering offenses committed in numerous countries. Proceedings are currently being handled in multiple nations worldwide.

As the petition is solely for a judicial probe, and this is not a case for damages, there is no demand by the complainants for monetary compensation. This filing would not be the first case against Iranian officials brought in Argentina.