🔗 Share this article

The celebrated author Jilly Cooper, who passed away unexpectedly at the age of 88, sold 11m volumes of her various sweeping books over her 50-year writing career. Cherished by every sensible person over a certain age (forty-five), she was introduced to a younger audience last year with the Disney+ adaptation of Rivals.

Cooper's Fictional Universe

Longtime readers would have liked to watch the Rutshire chronicles in chronological order: beginning with Riders, originally published in 1985, in which the character Rupert Campbell-Black, scoundrel, heartbreaker, equestrian, is debuts. But that’s a side note – what was striking about seeing Rivals as a box set was how effectively Cooper’s universe had remained relevant. The chronicles encapsulated the 1980s: the power dressing and puffball skirts; the obsession with class; the upper class disdaining the flashy new money, both overlooking everyone else while they snipped about how room-temperature their bubbly was; the sexual politics, with inappropriate behavior and misconduct so everyday they were practically figures in their own right, a double act you could trust to drive the narrative forward.

While Cooper might have occupied this period totally, she was never the typical fish not noticing the ocean because it’s ubiquitous. She had a humanity and an perceptive wisdom that you could easily miss from her public persona. All her creations, from the canine to the equine to her parents to her French exchange’s brother, was always “completely delightful” – unless, that is, they were “absolutely divine”. People got groped and more in Cooper’s work, but that was never condoned – it’s remarkable how acceptable it is in many more highbrow books of the time.

Background and Behavior

She was affluent middle-class, which for practical purposes meant that her dad had to hold down a job, but she’d have described the strata more by their customs. The middle classes anxiously contemplated about every little detail, all the time – what society might think, primarily – and the elite didn’t bother with “stuff”. She was risqué, at times very much, but her language was never vulgar.

She’d narrate her childhood in storybook prose: “Dad went to battle and Mom was deeply concerned”. They were both completely gorgeous, engaged in a eternal partnership, and this Cooper mirrored in her own partnership, to a editor of war books, Leo Cooper. She was 24, he was twenty-seven, the relationship wasn’t perfect (he was a unfaithful type), but she was consistently at ease giving people the secret for a successful union, which is squeaky bed but (key insight), they’re noisy with all the mirth. He avoided reading her books – he read Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel worse. She didn’t mind, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be spotted reading battle accounts.

Forever keep a diary – it’s very difficult, when you’re mid-twenties, to recollect what age 24 felt like

Early Works

Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth book in the Romance collection, which began with Emily in 1975. If you came to Cooper in reverse, having started in the main series, the early novels, AKA “the novels named after affluent ladies” – also Octavia and Harriet – were almost there, every male lead feeling like a prototype for the iconic character, every main character a little bit drippy. Plus, page for page (I can't verify statistically), there wasn't the same quantity of sex in them. They were a bit reserved on issues of decorum, women always worrying that men would think they’re immoral, men saying outrageous statements about why they favored virgins (comparably, seemingly, as a true gentleman always wants to be the primary to unseal a tin of instant coffee). I don’t know if I’d advise reading these stories at a impressionable age. I thought for a while that that is what affluent individuals really thought.

They were, however, incredibly precisely constructed, effective romances, which is far more difficult than it seems. You experienced Harriet’s unwanted pregnancy, Bella’s pissy family-by-marriage, Emily’s remote Scottish life – Cooper could take you from an all-is-lost moment to a jackpot of the soul, and you could not ever, even in the beginning, put your finger on how she managed it. At one moment you’d be chuckling at her incredibly close depictions of the sheets, the following moment you’d have tears in your eyes and uncertainty how they appeared.

Writing Wisdom

Questioned how to be a writer, Cooper would often state the kind of thing that the famous author would have said, if he could have been bothered to guide a novice: employ all five of your senses, say how things aromatic and looked and audible and touched and tasted – it really lifts the prose. But perhaps more practical was: “Always keep a notebook – it’s very hard, when you’re mid-twenties, to recall what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the first things you observe, in the more extensive, more populated books, which have 17 heroines rather than just one, all with decidedly aristocratic names, unless they’re American, in which case they’re called Helen. Even an age difference of four years, between two siblings, between a man and a lady, you can perceive in the conversation.

The Lost Manuscript

The backstory of Riders was so perfectly Jilly Cooper it couldn't possibly have been true, except it certainly was true because a major newspaper made a public request about it at the period: she finished the entire draft in 1970, prior to the early novels, carried it into the downtown and left it on a public transport. Some context has been intentionally omitted of this tale – what, for case, was so important in the urban area that you would forget the only copy of your novel on a public transport, which is not that different from abandoning your baby on a railway? Certainly an meeting, but what kind?

Cooper was prone to amp up her own chaos and ineptitude