🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, writer the author poses a challenge: typical injunctions to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not benevolent calls for self-expression – they can be pitfalls. Burey’s debut book – a mix of recollections, studies, cultural commentary and conversations – seeks to unmask how companies co-opt identity, transferring the burden of corporate reform on to staff members who are often marginalized.

Personal Journey and Broader Context

The impetus for the book originates in part in Burey’s own career trajectory: different positions across business retail, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, filtered through her experience as a Black disabled woman. The two-fold position that the author encounters – a back-and-forth between asserting oneself and looking for safety – is the engine of Authentic.

It lands at a moment of collective fatigue with institutional platitudes across the US and beyond, as backlash to DEI initiatives grow, and numerous companies are scaling back the very frameworks that earlier assured transformation and improvement. The author steps into that landscape to argue that retreating from the language of authenticity – that is, the corporate language that trivializes identity as a set of surface traits, quirks and pastimes, forcing workers focused on controlling how they are perceived rather than how they are handled – is not a solution; we must instead redefine it on our own terms.

Minority Staff and the Display of Self

Via detailed stories and conversations, the author demonstrates how employees from minority groups – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, women, disabled individuals – learn early on to calibrate which self will “be acceptable”. A weakness becomes a drawback and people overcompensate by attempting to look palatable. The act of “bringing your full self” becomes a reflective surface on which all manner of assumptions are projected: emotional labor, sharing personal information and ongoing display of appreciation. As the author states, we are asked to share our identities – but absent the safeguards or the trust to withstand what comes out.

As Burey explains, workers are told to share our identities – but lacking the safeguards or the reliance to survive what comes out.’

Real-Life Example: An Employee’s Journey

She illustrates this situation through the story of a worker, a hearing-impaired staff member who took it upon himself to educate his co-workers about deaf culture and interaction standards. His eagerness to discuss his background – an act of candor the office often praises as “authenticity” – temporarily made everyday communications smoother. However, Burey points out, that progress was fragile. Once employee changes eliminated the casual awareness the employee had developed, the culture of access disappeared. “All the information left with them,” he states tiredly. What remained was the weariness of having to start over, of having to take charge for an company’s developmental journey. In Burey’s view, this illustrates to be told to reveal oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a structure that praises your openness but declines to codify it into regulation. Authenticity becomes a trap when institutions depend on employee revelation rather than institutional answerability.

Writing Style and Concept of Dissent

Burey’s writing is simultaneously understandable and expressive. She blends intellectual rigor with a tone of connection: an offer for audience to engage, to question, to dissent. In Burey’s opinion, workplace opposition is not loud rebellion but principled refusal – the practice of rejecting sameness in workplaces that demand thankfulness for basic acceptance. To resist, from her perspective, is to challenge the stories organizations describe about justice and inclusion, and to refuse engagement in customs that maintain inequity. It might look like calling out discrimination in a discussion, withdrawing of voluntary “inclusion” effort, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s identity is provided to the organization. Dissent, she suggests, is an declaration of personal dignity in settings that frequently encourage obedience. It is a practice of honesty rather than defiance, a way of insisting that an individual’s worth is not based on organizational acceptance.

Restoring Sincerity

The author also avoids rigid dichotomies. Authentic does not simply discard “genuineness” entirely: on the contrary, she urges its redefinition. According to the author, sincerity is not simply the unrestricted expression of personality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more intentional correspondence between one’s values and personal behaviors – an integrity that resists distortion by organizational requirements. As opposed to considering genuineness as a mandate to reveal too much or conform to sterilized models of candor, the author encourages followers to maintain the parts of it grounded in truth-telling, personal insight and ethical clarity. In her view, the objective is not to discard genuineness but to move it – to remove it from the boardroom’s performative rituals and toward connections and workplaces where trust, equity and answerability make {